Box Office Battle: ‘28 Years Later’ Roars to $30 Million Opening While Pixar’s ‘Elio’ Flops with $21 Million Debut

The weekend’s box office showdown saw Universal’s “How to Train Your Dragon” remake maintain its grip on the No. 1 spot in North America, but the spotlight quickly shifted to two very different newcomers: Sony’s gritty zombie thriller “28 Years Later” and Disney-Pixar’s ambitious space adventure “Elio.”

‘28 Years Later’ Stuns With $30 Million Opening Weekend

Sony’s “28 Years Later,” the long-awaited sequel to the cult classic franchise originally launched by Danny Boyle, delivered a strong opening of $30 million domestically, beating expectations amid a crowded summer slate. The film’s blend of intense horror, evolved infected creatures, and nostalgic appeal drew in fans of the original series and newcomers alike.

Critics and audiences have praised the film for its fresh take on the post-apocalyptic horror genre. Directed again by Danny Boyle with co-writer Alex Garland, “28 Years Later” ups the ante with larger-than-life infected, including the terrifying Alpha creature played by Chi Lewis-Parry. The film’s strong box office performance signals that the franchise still holds significant sway in the horror community.

Industry analysts had predicted a solid opening but some were surprised by the strength, especially given the film’s R-rating and niche genre. The $30 million haul places it comfortably among the better-performing horror releases of the year, hinting at promising legs if word-of-mouth remains positive.

Pixar’s ‘Elio’ Faces Harsh Reality With Worst Debut Ever

In stark contrast, Disney and Pixar’s “Elio” has suffered a major disappointment with a third-place debut of just $21 million across 3,750 theaters in North America. This marks the worst opening weekend in Pixar’s history, a surprising result given the studio’s decades-long reputation for box office hits.

“Elio” tells the story of a spunky, alien-obsessed preteen mistakenly chosen as Earth’s ambassador to an intergalactic community. Despite the film’s unique premise and Pixar’s signature animation style, the $150 million production failed to ignite the kind of audience enthusiasm the studio typically commands.

The movie was projected to bring in between $25 million and $30 million for its debut but fell short by a significant margin. Overseas, “Elio” managed only $14 million, leading to a catastrophic global total of $35 million. For Pixar, which has often been a reliable box office powerhouse, this result is a jarring signal of shifting audience tastes or possible marketing missteps.

What’s Behind the Numbers? Audience Preferences and Franchise Power

The box office results underscore some key trends in today’s theatrical landscape. First, there is clearly still a strong appetite for franchise horror, especially when sequels deliver fresh scares and familiar lore. “28 Years Later” leveraged its cult status and loyal fan base effectively, while benefiting from positive critical reviews praising its innovation and scares.

Meanwhile, original animated features face growing challenges in the competitive summer market dominated by superhero blockbusters and long-standing franchises. “Elio” had the Pixar brand, but its story may not have resonated as strongly with audiences seeking familiar characters or franchise entries. Additionally, Pixar’s marketing push seemed muted compared to past tentpole releases.

The international market, often a crucial revenue stream, also played a role. “28 Years Later” outperformed “Elio” overseas, despite the latter’s family-friendly genre typically doing well abroad. This could reflect a waning global enthusiasm for original animation compared to established franchises or culturally resonant properties.

Industry experts suggest that while Pixar’s dip is concerning, it is unlikely to derail the studio’s long-term dominance if they adapt to evolving audience demands. For Sony, the success of “28 Years Later” could open doors for further installments or spin-offs, capitalizing on the renewed interest in the horror franchise.

Final Thoughts

This weekend’s box office battle tells two very different stories: one of franchise horror triumphing against the odds, and another of a high-profile animated release falling flat despite pedigree and budget. As studios recalibrate strategies for upcoming releases, the mixed results for “28 Years Later” and “Elio” offer valuable insights into what today’s audiences are craving — and what they’re ready to leave behind.

For more up-to-date box office breakdowns and movie industry insights, follow @thetipsycriticreview and check out our in-depth analyses at The Tipsy Critic.